What I learned week 10
What
I learned week 10
This week Dr. Baker
talked to us about the changing pharmaceutical industry focusing on the law
aspects. Dr. Baker is a pharmacist he also has a law degree, so he has an
inside perspective on how the law implications apply to pharmacy. It’s
interesting to me because out of all the healthcare providers, physicians,
nurses, pharmacists, pharmacy techs etc. pharmacists are the most educated on law.
They are the only healthcare providers who are required to take a law class for
their graduation requirements. Dr. Baker kicked off the discussion by
discussing some crucial laws and amendments passed by the U.S government which
established rules and regulations for the pharmaceutical industry that we still
use today. For example, the Durham-Humphrey Amendment or Prescription Drug
Amendment of 1951 (amendment to the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act of 1938). The
purpose of this amendment was to standardize what a “drug” is, which thus
established the requirements of medical supervision to obtain. It’s interesting
because Dr. Baker emphasized that anything that you take that causes a biological
reaction in the human body is considered a drug, but that does not describe the
law definition of what a drug is. Herbal preparations, vitamins, minerals and
other nutritionals are termed “food supplements” or sometimes “herbals,” and
are not regulated by the FDA and are not classified as drugs. All such products
must bear a warning that such products were not reviewed or approved by the FDA
for safety or effectiveness. Accordingly, the individual consumer must be aware
of the potential negative effects of using these preparations and the potential
interactions with prescription drugs they may be taking. The amendment established
two classes of drugs, prescription and over the counter, and methods by which
consumers could obtain each. This amendment also established label and labeling
requirements unique to prescription drugs. Moving on, a trend that Dr. Baker
talked about was the popular move by pharmaceuticals manufacturers to make
their prescription drugs OTC. As drugs hit their patent cliffs, many
manufacturers are pushing to get their drugs on the shelves of pharmacies
instead of being prescription only. As
the role of the pharmacist becomes more patient and counseling-centered, the
healthcare market is changing to keep pace with more modern needs, such as
self-treatment. Self-treatment provides patients the ability to diagnose their
own conditions and pick an appropriate medication from the pharmacy to treat
their symptoms. This process allows a certain freedom for consumers to actively
engage in their own health. For patients who self-treat, access to OTC
medication is of prime importance. Many medications that are available as OTC
today were previously labeled as prescription medications such as Flonase, a
common antihistamine even I use regularly. As more safety studies and trials
are conducted for different drugs, they can be deemed appropriate for use
without a prescription. I researched what it takes to make this switch and
discovered there are three main factors to take into consideration
1.
Benefit-risk comparison
2.
Consumer-friendly labeling
3.
How to make
the drug a good choice as an alternative to prescription medication
Because Dr. Baker emphasized the push for prescription drugs moving
towards OTC, he brought up the morning after pill we know as Plan B. Plan B
wanted their drug to no longer be prescription only, but OTC. In the end, Plan
B became OTC with no age restriction. So basically 13-year-old with $40 in
their pocket can walk into their corner CVS and buy Plan B. For over a decade, reproductive rights advocates, politicians,
the FDA, and Plan B
manufacturers have clashed back and forth about the regulation and restriction
with advocates for the pill pushing for the greater availability. Opponents
were arguing for limited access for girls considered by some to be too young to
understand the risks. I find this topic very interesting because I am an
advocate for the right to emergency contraception. Now the fact that there is
no age limit I question, but I am proud that our government has taken the steps
to make Plan B and its generics available to everyone. The timeline is
interesting an important to myself because it outlines a unique law perspective
for a drug.
·
2 contact
hours per calendar year in pharmacy law
·
15 contact
hours maximum toward the 20-contact hour minimum per calendar year through home
study
·
5 contact
hours per calendar year in the area of sterile compounding if the registrant
oversees or is directly engaged in the practice of sterile compounding or who
practices in a pharmacy licensed pursuant to M.G.L. c. 112, § 39G or 39I
·
3 contact
hours per calendar year in complex non-sterile compounding if the registrant
oversees or is directly engaged in the practice of complex non-sterile
compounding or who practices in a pharmacy licensed pursuant to M.G.L. c. 112,
§ 39H
References
Chang, Jongwha et al. “Prescription to
over-the-Counter Switches in the United States.” Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice 5.3 (2016):
149–154. PMC. Web. 6
Nov. 2017.
http://www.continuingeducation.com/pharmacy/state-ce-requirements/massachusetts
Comments
Post a Comment